New Partner: SYTYCD Top 20

My plan, as I said last week, was to talk a bit about story making and reality TV, vis-à-vis my favorite reality show, So You Think You Can Dance. I had a specific plan for a post about the top twenty episode, which aired last Wednesday; I was going to talk about the partnerships.

 

 

Your Top Twenty

Partnerships are the most powerful tool in the So You Think You Can Dance story-making arsenal. Want to make the audience respond to a particular dancer? Give them a story-making moment in their feelings for another dancer. Give them a story-making partnership; put their moving body in conversation with someone else’s, and see what narrative you get. See if you can get a romance!

omg, that bboy is a big softie for Sabra

I stayed up really late last Wednesday writing many words about SYTYCD partnerships from days gone by—the magical ones, in which opening up to a partner seemed to open up a whole new movement vocabulary; the weirdly unsuccessful ones, where two hot talented kids were thrown together and nothing happened, the jelly didn’t jell, and it was really painful for everyone, probably the hot talented kids most of all.

But all these words I wrote last week didn’t feel like they were getting anywhere. Dimming my exciting for the story of SYTYCD season nine was the shocking lack of interesting lady dancers. Somehow, we’ve been saddled with all these nondescript children who look the same, and who have nothing to say for themselves apart from their impressive extensions.  How are we supposed to get good partnerships with such a lack of personality?

Watching the episode I felt an escalating irritation, well beyond even my own normal avid response to SYTYCD.  And it took me a while to figure it out, why I was so mad about these lame ladies.

Then I realized. It is because I miss my ladies, my SYTYCD lady watcher dance floor friends.

ladeez

I have spent the last two weekends at weddings, which means that some of my best loved lady friends from the past many years convened on different dance floors—on a brick dance floor, in a sweaty barn in Pennsylvania’s Amish country; on a paving-block dance floor overlooking an Oregon mountain. For two Saturdays in a row, I got sweaty dancing, with my best girls.

Some of these ladies were my regular SYTYCD viewing partners.  One lady friend and I had almost weekly viewings, with dinner. (We called SYTYCD “Prance,” because of our imaginary spin-off show “So You Think You Can Prance,” which was about ponies.) We’d ask each other, What are we cooking for Prance this week, and who all is coming? We asked these questions in a lovely moment of our late twenties and early thirties when the people we loved, our peers, people who were helping us figure out our path through this weird life, lived mostly in the same place. When we didn’t know who would come to Prance, and cook, or who would be up for what party, where, because it could be anyone, and no one had to book a plane ticket or find a babysitter.

On that sweaty Pennsylvania dance floor, particularly, I had a strange vertiginous sense of what it meant to be us, this group of ladies, at this moment in life. We had flown together from across the country—all of us separated from each other by the demands of professional (and mostly academic) life, uprooted from old comrades, still the new people in our new places, with new groups of friends. The dance floor became a stand-in for a home front that no longer existed.

And if the dance floor conjured an erased place, it stood in for a different time, too. Those of us sweating on the dance floor were young, or could believe we were, compared to the old folks with their feet up in the back of the room. There was no small amount of rocking out. The new music feels like our music, and our beginning of life.

But the illusion of being kids at a party was completely false, a mirage made possible by the various grandparents who took care of everyone’s actual kids, safe in far away states. We were not fully home, and we were not fully young. We looked lovely, we wore pretty dresses; we joked about shaping undergarments, our arms grew soft underneath.

We all left the next day. There was not much time for discussion, so the various satisfactions and disappointments and heartaches that become, precisely in the moment they’re forced by exhaustion onto the back burner, the constitutive experience so far of being thirty-something, went unparsed. We did not talk, much, about our variously successful careers or our breakups or marriages or children or the desire for them; about our long, solitary commutes.

All that we had to say, we had to make known through dancing, and I was so glad we had that vocabulary available to us, even though I kept having the sense that we were dancing on borrowed time, or, like the little mermaid, stealing our dancing feet from a body now destined for a different purpose.

Last week when I watched the top twenty episode of So You Think You Can Dance, I watched on a couch alone, thinking of friends who were not with me, either because they were on the other side of the country or because, just down the street, they were tied home by sick kids and work demands. I don’t know when the next wedding–the next dance floor–will be.

But it is not nothing to have this show to think about together. Alone on my couch, watching  the top twenty prancers, my phone vibrated with incoming messages from dispersed friends, giddy with opinions about this routine and that. It is not entirely a sad story, despite distance and looming old age, to live in a new and beloved place, still finding the chance to gossip with old friends about our favorite pase doblé.

I thought about partnering.  It’s cliché, right? I thought about lifting each other up.

SYTYCD sets up its partnerships to make love stories out of nothing, out of talented strangers.  But this silly show can do that because those strangers already share a language of movement, a knowledge about what the body means and can do in this short life, and the language is not unique to them.  My ladies and I have different talents, different bodies of knowledge than the people on the tv screen. But we, too, can get some serious talking done through the body’s moving language.  We are telling each other some stories, that are their own kind of strange, and lovely, and long-lasting romance.

True Stories

For the last few years, I’ve surprised myself by mostly foregoing television dramas in favor of sports and reality television.  I have had a three-season TV viewing schedule: Football in the fall, American Idol in winter and spring, and So You Think You Can Dance in the summer.

My affection for all of these things has been heartfelt and unironic—avid, you might say—if also a little bit shaped by the pleasure of being a professor type who is not too good for low-brow, cotton-candy, heart string pulling pleasures.

But if mostly I love watching these things because my fandom is so different from critical engagement, I also am fascinated by competition—and competition shows—precisely because of some of the same critical questions that occupy my nerdier life.  Watching SYTYCD, for example, is seriously an excellent exercise in applied genre theory. Or maybe what competition offers is some new genre, some new thing, something that requires its own vocabulary. That’s what I want to begin to sort through here.

1: Genre Risk.

The most amazing thing about watching a competition is that the ending is not yet written, which still blows my mind sometimes.

The uncertainty of a competition’s conclusion is so startling, I think, because it contrasts so starkly with what casting armies and producers and broadcasters try to give us as viewers, which is a strong sense of story and genre.  The job of those people, and many of them are extremely good at doing it, is to give their watchers some sense of conflict, of something on the line, with a particular sort of outcome more or less ordained by the laws of genre. Or maybe a conflict of genre, with competing laws.  Will Tom Brady’s precision triumph over of the broken Falstaffian brilliance of Rex Ryan? Will Adam Lambert’s gay majesty win over a requisite number of Danny Gokey’s sentimentalized heart-cancer fans?  These are serious questions, I can assure you, even if they are not yours, and what I see being worked out in the fan audiences of these shows is a fairly sophisticated debate about genre, WHICH IS WHY, and this a polemic for another time and place, I think more people who teach literary theory should WATCH THEM, because seriously nothing improved my classroom discussions about sentimentalism, aesthetics, and form, than being able to make reference to Danny Gokey, or, in different classes, Rex Ryan.

Danny Gokey hearts you, I am sad to say.

Anyway. As much as these competitions are set up as stories, as things, it is implied, that exist within the rules and logic of particular narrative structures, what is thrilling about the episode, the game, is precisely that it is not a story, it is not something bound to the rules we want genre to follow, because no producer or broadcaster, no matter how skilled, can actually know in advance how the story will end, or even if the story will be good.

Falstaff.

I think when you watch an unscripted competition or show, what you are actually watching is the gap between genre and life, hoping that it is very small, hoping against hope that it might actually be erased. Hoping that the values binding us to the narratives we hold dear will be affirmed when dry, flat life miraculously fits the curve of story. Bliss.

 2: Story of a Moment

Competitions, and competitions shows, don’t feature the same plot points as scripted stories.  Their main narrative feature, to my mind, is a thing called a “moment.” This is what Simon Cowell calls it, and I think he should know.

Adam Lambert tracks your tears.

“Moments” are to competition shows what Eliza’s tears are to Uncle Tom’s Cabin: they are the situation when the person you want to do their best (or maybe, the person you didn’t think could do their best) does their best, in a transformative way, and the audience is transformed and feels transformed, and then the competition changes, and that person moves closer to victory. They are narrative phenomena that Aristotle would be very interested in, if he were writing today (or maybe he did, and I’m just making a naive claim to originality–who knows!). They are a sign that, in its endless struggle with life, story is winning.

When Simon Cowell was on American Idol, he’d talk about this all the time: “you could have had a moment!” he’d chide, when the soul singer craps out on Motown week, or whatever.  Simon Cowell was both a very good story-maker, and a very explicit discusser of stories, and he would be quite clear about trying to give the singers he liked moments, because he knows that moments are what make people win.

The thing about the “moment” is that it can’t exactly be faked.  It can be set up and encouraged, by giving someone with appeal and potential good music, or a good partner, or the right play.  If you are Simon Cowell and you want Adam Lambert to win, you can let him sing “One” and hope that the best singer and the best song will nail that shit down. But even Simon Cowell can’t make the muse comply at exactly the right moment. The more you set it up, sometimes, the less effective it is—moments are most likely to be moments when the take the audience, and even the producers, by surprise.

Kris Allen. Heartless.

Sometimes, there are no moments, and life wins. I love that, too.

* * *

Anyway, now that Game of Thrones is done, I’m hoping to talk a bit here about the push and pull of story on So You Think You Can Dance. I haven’t been doing this so far because I’m not totally interested in audition weeks, which are packaged for us retrospectively, with annoying music at the wrong times, and with very staged moments, that are frustrating because they are faked, only aping their more spontaneous cousins on live TV.

SYTYCD is often the most ham-handed of my true life stories, and many of the stories it tries to give its viewers are schlocky at best, troubling at worst. For instance, the genre conflict that SYTYCD is feeding its viewers so far is totally annoying to me, so much so that it’s almost killing my pleasure for the dancers themselves, who otherwise I quite like.  On the one hand, we have this excellent dancer lady Alexa who seems to have problems expressing her feelings. Or so we were told ad nauseum during Vegas week.  SYTYCD loves this plot line–one it similarly gave us in claiming that the precociously gifted Danny Tidwell needed to acess his feelings in order to be “beyond” (I can’t find a clip for Mia Michael’s famous BE BEYOND, DANNY speach, which is really a shame). But I hate this plot line because I come from a ballet background, in my own small way, and I think what most people on this show need is fewer feelings and more strong lines. Ahem.  Anyway, the other person we’re set up to love is the self-trained popper Cedric who, unlike Alexa, has lots of feelings but not a lot of experience, sigh, and also the fact that this is a white lady vs a black dude is lost on no one.  WHO WILL WIN?? You can bet good old Nigel is going to be working really hard to give Cedric some moments. Nigel is like the first chapter to Love and Theft, with a British accent on life tv.

Yet for all my frustrations, and I can’t say I really care. Dancers dance for love, not fortune, and rarely even for fame, so SYTYCD’s stories always seem to me the most avid, the most heart felt, the most momentous of all.

 

Let me Clear My Throat

I grew up, strange and bookish, in rural Iowa. By and large I’m so grateful for this. But saying that rural Iowa is wonderful (it is) is not the same thing as saying that rural Iowa is an always easy place to grow up, especially if you are strange and bookish.  You feel alienated, and you feel (and are) far away from other alienated people. There are not many of you.

But a good part of growing up strange and bookish in rural Iowa, in the eighties and nineties, was that you could spend a lot of time listening to the Beastie Boys.  For me, the Beastie Boys are the sound of a rural childhood–of my walkman while I took my dog for interminable Iowa afternoon walks, the sound of a friend’s radio driving through open Iowa fields to a basketball game an hour away. The sound of the moment when it’s less weird and lonely at the high school dance, streamers and “Sabotage” filling the Iowa high school gym.

<iframe width=”420″ height=”315″ src=”http://www.youtube.com/embed/z5rRZdiu1UE” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

The Beastie Boys have always sounded to me like the sound of being okay. It will be okay. You might be lonely, but you are not alone. (Also, probably, you are dancing.)

Which is all to say: the death of Adam Youch today hit me surprisingly hard.

Twitter is full right now of people saying things like (this is David Malitz, from the Washington Post): “Seriously, who didn’t like the Beastie Boys? No matter the room, put on the Beasties and *everyone’s* happy. Very few like that.”

That strikes me as exactly right, and for whatever small tribute it’s worth I just need to say that that quality was so incredibly, incredibly desperately important for the rural weird youth of the twentieth century’s last decades. There was a lot of strange stuff to listen to, and that was great, but the Beastie Boys was the strange stuff that everybody listened to. No social fissure, and there were many, seemed too deep for the Beastie Boys to suture.

<iframe width=”420″ height=”315″ src=”http://www.youtube.com/embed/BptQHAW2T5M” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>

For me, as a weird rural girl, the Beastie Boys did this magic thing that both expressed my strangeness and made it less troubling to be strange. If most of the broad reach of the Beastie Boys is the music itself, the other part, surely, the thing that makes them so universally appealing, is the sound of people embracing their strageness, their alienation, and making it into anthemic badassery. Whatever pained and awkward kids they were, or we were, did not have to be forgotten or apologized for. The awkwardness could just kick ass.

<iframe width=”420″ height=”315″ src=”http://www.youtube.com/embed/07Y0cy-nvAg” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen></iframe>